A Report Finds that Hundreds of Thousands More U.S. Service Members Are Exposed to Toxic Chemicals than The Dod Knows About.

According to a recent report from the Environmental Working Group (EWG), the Department of Defense (DOD) significantly underestimated the number of American service members who were exposed to potentially hazardous levels of long-lasting chemicals in the drinking water provided on military installations.

While the DOD estimated that 175,000 service members were exposed annually across 24 bases, the EWG estimated that figure to be closer to over 600,000 over 116 military facilities.

Instead of actively aiming to inform service members and clean up its legacy contamination, the Department of Defense is attempting to minimize these hazards. Scott Fabert, senior vice president of government relations at EWG, spoke to The Guardian. It has a long history of turning a blind eye to the pollution caused by PFAS.

Read More: Tips for A Holiday Season with Less Waste.!

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl compounds, sometimes known as PFAS, are known as environmental toxins because of their persistence in both the environment and the human body as well as their inability to degrade. Since the 1940s, they have been widely used in the industry for a variety of applications, including goods that are heat-, stain-, and water-resistant.

According to The War Horse, they are also an active component of aqueous film-forming foam, and the military’s reliance on this foam is a significant factor in why U.S. military stations have some of the highest PFAS concentrations in the nation. Because PFAS exposure has been linked to everything from cancer to immune system suppression to reproductive problems, this is poor news for the health of service personnel.

For instance, after 35 years of service in the Air National Guard at Pease Air Force Base in New Hampshire, Kendall Brock received a diagnosis of stage 4 bladder cancer. The groundwater at the base had tested positive for PFAS two years prior to his diagnosis.

According to his wife Doris, “If you think that you’ve been drinking the water, washing in it, and eating food that you cooked in it for years and years and you know about this it’s really alarming.” It’s quite spooky.

As part of the National Defense Authorization Act for that year, Congress mandated that the DOD submit a report on the possible health effects of PFAS exposure for veterans and active duty service personnel. There are various issues with the report, according to EWG, which was published in April:

Read More: Local Opposition to Solar Project Leads to Cancellation in Ohio.!

  • Outdated safety standards: The DOD based its calculations on exposure to PFOA and PFOS two of the most well-known PFAS on the 2016 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) advisory safety limit of 70 parts per trillion (ppt). This led it to conclude that 24 installations serve their resident’s contaminated drinking water. However, when the report was released, the EPA was in the process of updating its advisory safety levels to near-zero ppt. While the update was released in June two months after the DOD report Faber told The Guardian that the DOD was aware of the upcoming changes and likely published the report early so as not to have to accommodate them. Taking the EPA s new safety limits into account, EWG came up with a calculation of more than 640,000 service members exposed to at least 116 installations.

  • Incomplete Analysis: Even if you accept the 70 ppt safety limit, the DOD underestimated exposure. It excluded at least four bases from its report where levels higher than 70 ppt had been detected in the drinking water before the report was released: Fort Leavenworth, Kansas; Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey; Yakima Training Center, Washington; and Fort Bragg, North Carolina.
  •  Limited Timeline: The DOD figure of 175,000 only accounts for how many people might be drinking the contaminated water at the bases currently. It does not consider everyone who has lived and worked at the bases between now and at least the 1970s when the firefighting foam began to be used, nor does it account for the fact that service members often move between bases.
  •  Incomplete Health Assessment: The report did not consider all the potential health impacts of PFAS, including that PFOA and PFOS have been linked to testicular and kidney cancer. What s more, they did not consider the impact of PFAS exposure on pregnant people and babies, despite the fact that around 13,000 active service members give birth each year, according to the DOD s own statistics.

Read More: USPS Declares Electrification of Its Fleet of Mail Trucks.!

According to The Guardian, Faber didn’t just critique the report’s content. Additionally, it had to be requested from the department if service members or other members of the public wanted to read it because it had never been posted on the DOD’s PFAS website.

According to Faber, that is the aspect that should concern every American. They didn’t only purposely underestimate how many military members were exposed; they also kept it a secret.

A High-Stakes Meeting on Biodiversity Ends with A Deal to Protect 30% of Nature by 2030.

Nations gathered in Montreal for the COP15 UN Biodiversity Conference have agreed to protect 30% of Earth for nature by 2030, in a historic agreement for the preservation of biodiversity.

The rich yet endangered biodiversity of the globe is to be protected through the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Additionally, it includes goals for the protection of Indigenous peoples’ rights, as well as for the preservation and restoration of ecosystems including wetlands and rainforests.

We rely on biodiversity for food, medicine, energy, clean air and water, security from natural disasters, as well as recreation, and cultural inspiration, and it supports all systems of life on earth, according to the framework. Biodiversity is essential to human well-being, a healthy planet, and economic prosperity for all people. It is also essential for living well in balance and harmony with Mother Earth.

According to BBC News, the pact aims to protect genetic variety and ensure that natural resources, such as plant-based medicines, are distributed fairly and evenly.

According to BBC News, UN Secretary-General Ant nio Guterres stated that we are finally beginning to establish a peace agreement with nature.

The agreement contains a goal to stop the extinction of species, which has been progressing at an alarming rate, by taking immediate and dramatic action.

If nothing is done to lessen the intensity of the drivers of biodiversity loss, an estimated 1 million species already face extinction, many of them within decades. This is based on the average of about 25% of species in examined animal and plant groups being threatened. The global pace of species extinction, which is currently at least tens to hundreds of times higher than it has averaged over the past 10 million years, will accelerate further without such action, according to the framework.

According to The Guardian, the agreement also aims to overhaul $500 billion in environmentally detrimental subsidies.

It has very specific and defined goals for pesticides, stopping the extinction of species, and ending bad subsidies. According to The Guardian, France’s Minister for Ecological Transition and delegation leader Christophe B. Chu stated that the country would increase funding for biodiversity twofold in 2025 and thrice by 2030.

Despite a last-minute informal protest from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), which is home to the second-largest tropical forest on Earth, the accord was made official by the host China.

Read More: Beginning of Oil Recovery from KXL Pipeline Spill by Company.!

The DRC declared that it did not endorse the accord and that it was the duty of wealthier nations to finance conservation efforts in underdeveloped nations. However, because those particular phrases were not used, the comments were not categorized as formal objections.

Some nations criticized the process as being undemocratic after China’s Minister of Ecology and Environment Huang Runqiu approved the Kunming-Montreal framework despite reservations from the DRC. The framework depends on the participating nations acting with confidence and goodwill and is not legally enforceable.

It is completed legally. What can I say morally? According to The Guardian, Lee White, the minister of water, forests, the sea, and the environment of Gabon, declared the talks to be concluded.

Viviana Figueroa, a representative of the International Indigenous Forum on Biodiversity, expressed her satisfaction with the framework’s recognition of Indigenous peoples’ significance to biodiversity preservation.

It feels like a paradigm shift to us. According to Figueroa, they are acknowledging this crucial but hidden function, as The Guardian highlighted.

Read More: A Study Finds that The Microplastics that Fall on Auckland Weigh as Much as 3 Million Plastic Bottles per Year.

Steven Guilbeault, Canada’s Minister of Environment and Climate Change lauded the accord and compared it to the 2015 Paris Agreement, a binding worldwide agreement to limit global temperatures to two degrees Celsius.

Guilbeault, as quoted by BBC News, remarked that this is a historical moment on par with what Paris achieved for the environment.

An Overview of Solar Jobs for Those Who Have Been Incarcerated.!

People who have served time in prison still have a very difficult time getting steady work. A recent study found that almost 60% of federal prison inmates who are released are unemployed. Additionally, research indicates that individuals who did obtain employment lacked both job security and upward mobility.

Similar to climate change, mass incarceration is an issue in this country. Even while it appears that many people are aware of it, not enough has been done to change the situation. While this was going on, disinformation, stigma, and controversy around the issues spread like wildfires along the West Coast.

But what if addressing the climate could be the key to assisting those who have served time in prison to rejoin the workforce?

<h2>How the Solar Industry Can Benefit the Formerly Incarcerated</h2>

Courtesy: Sunrun

Two of the largest obstacles to effective re-entry for persons who have served time in prison are employment and education.

At the same time, employers in the renewable energy sector frequently point to a shortage of trained, skilled people as their main obstacle to market expansion.

Courtesy: IREC National Solar Jobs Census 2021

There are currently over 255,000 solar workers in the country.

<h2>Solar Programs for Formerly Incarcerated People</h2>
<h3>Grid Alternatives</h3>

We need that number to exceed 900,000 by 2035 in order to achieve President Joe Biden’s goals for sustainable energy and combating climate change.

<h4>How to Apply to Grid Alternatives</h4>

Therefore, an additional 650,000 solar workers are required.

The potential for solar to create secure employment for people wishing to re-enter the economy is enormous. The only prerequisite is looking for training programmes in solar installation, which doesn’t require any prior education.

<h3>Homeboy Industries</h3>

16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio”>

Grid Alternatives is a group committed to increasing access to renewable energy for everybody. Its goal is to develop locally driven solutions that use renewable energy to improve economic and environmental justice.

Through volunteering and solar installation training, the organisation has assisted numerous persons making a comeback in breaking into the solar business. You can read numerous solar work success stories from re-entered volunteers and employees on the website for Grid Alternatives.

In its offices located around California, Colorado, Washington, D.C., and Nicaragua, Grid Alternatives offers practical training for solar installation. If you reside in any of these regions, get in touch with your neighbourhood GRID office to find out what’s available.

<h4>How to Apply to Homeboy Industries</h4>

Additionally, you can register for an orientation to find out more about Grid Alternatives SolarCorps fellowship programmes that might offer training possibilities for solar installation in your area.

According to its website, Homeboy Industries is the biggest gang rehabilitation and ex-offender re-entry programme in the world. What began as a means of enhancing the lives of ex-gang members in Los Angeles has grown into a global network.

80 Homeboy and Homegirl participants are trained in the installation of solar panels every year in Los Angeles, usually at no cost to them because of contributions. The current pass rate is between 65 and 70%, which is significantly higher than the 40% national pass rate.

<h3>Crossroads Solar</h3>

Homeboy also collaborates with businesses to assist programme graduates in finding employment.

The demanding four-month full-time solar installation training programme offered by Homeboy Industries includes tuition, tutoring, and financial help. The East Los Angeles Skills Center is where the Photovoltaic Training Program is held.

<h4>How to Apply to Crossroads Solar</h4>

Learn more about the initiative here or get in touch with the Homeboy team at

<h3>Apprenticeships</h3>

solarpanel@homeboyindustries.org.

Crossroads Solar, an Indiana-based manufacturer of solar panels, lives up to its tagline of “creating second chances and a greener earth one panel at a time.” Released criminals who have earned the right to enter the workforce with dignity are employed by Crossroads.

<h4>How to Find Solar Apprenticeships</h4>

The amazing thing about Crossroads is that every single member of staff has served time in prison and that helping those who have been incarcerated is their main focus. In fact, it’s a necessity of their position.

<h3>Community College Programs</h3>

You can fill out an application here if you or someone you know is returning to society with a crime on their record and is interested in working at Crossroads Solar.

<h2>Types of Jobs in the Solar Industry</h2>

Apprenticeships can be a better way to reenter the employment for some people. Through an apprenticeship, reentering the workforce is typically simpler. They may also present excellent chances for networking.

If you want to gain more practical, hands-on solar training to feel more confidence in your abilities or if you’d want to investigate several careers in the solar business to determine which could be the best fit for you, you might want to think about joining an apprenticeship.

Read More: Registrations of EVs Go up By 57%.

Solar Job Title Qualification Average Salary Range
Solar Installer Certification or High School/GED $45,000-$55,0001
Electrician (Solar Expertise) Certification or High School/GED $45,000-$55,0002
Field Service Technician Associate s Degree $45,000-$55,0003
Solar Site Assessor Associate s Degree $55,000-$65,0001
Solar Marketing Professional Associate s Degree $45,000-$75,0004
Solar Sales Consultant Associate s Degree $65,000-$85,0002

There are numerous apprenticeship programmes available for solar careers. Search for solar apprentice on simplyhired.com or apprenticeship.gov to find them.

The need for workers in the solar sector is so tremendous that an increasing number of community institutions are now providing solar technology training programs. Find a course near you by conducting an online search for “community college course on solar installer”.

HomeBoy and Grid Alternatives are more geared toward solar panel installations, while Crossroads concentrates on the production of solar panels. The truth is that the solar sector offers a variety of occupations, some of which are more specialised than others.

1” id=”mediavine-settings”>

The main professions we anticipate seeing growth are listed below, along with the required education and compensation. Be aware that each state tends to have different requirements and compensation ranges.

Fossil Fuel Magnates and Companies Sanctioned Over Ukraine Invasion Are Part of Russia’s Cop27 Delegation.!

At the COP27 UN climate conference in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, there are more than 600 fossil fuel lobbyists, including Russian oligarchs and businesses that have been sanctioned in reaction to the invasion of Ukraine.

After the UAE, the Russian delegation has the second-highest number of participants with connections to the fossil fuel sector with 33. DeSmog discovered that of those 33, more than half are either sanctioned themselves or have connections to other sanctioned people or businesses.

According to Ukrainian delegate Dr. Oleksiy Ryabchyn, “[It’s] ridiculous to know that Russian oligarchs are creeping through the halls.” The fact that they can move around without restriction is absurd. For me, these oligarchs shouldn’t be [at COP] if they can’t put an end to this brutal conflict.

DeSmog estimated that there were a total of 18 Russian delegates who were either linked to or personally sanctioned. Among them were Oleg Deripaska and Andrey Melnichenko, two coal oligarchs. Deripaska owns shares in multiple coal companies. The Guardian reports that he had had connections to the aluminum business. The UK has currently imposed sanctions on him. Meanwhile, the EU has imposed personal sanctions on Melnichenko. He gave his wife control of Siberian Coal Energy Company, Russia’s largest coal producer, the day before the sanctions went into effect in March, according to DeSmog.

Read More: Egypt Expected to Sell Gas to Europe While Boosting Renewable Energy After a $500 Million Deal with The U.S. and Germany.

Delegates from a number of sanctioned corporations were also present, according to The Guardian. Among these businesses were:

  1. Gazprom: A gas company under U.S. and EU sanctions sent six delegates.
  2. Sberbank: A Russian bank sanctioned by the U.S. and the EU sent its managing director.
  3. Tatneft: An EU-sanctioned oil and gas company sent three delegates.
  4. Lukoil: An oil company sanctioned by the U.S.
  5. Severstal: A mining company sanctioned by the U.S.
  6. Magnitogorsk Iron and Steel Works: A steel producer sanctioned by the U.S.

Three Sibur delegates were additionally present, according to Desmog. The former CEO of this, the largest petrochemical corporation in Russia, Dmitry Konov, resigned in March after being the target of UK and EU sanctions.

Global Witness senior campaigner Louis Wilson responded to the findings by claiming that the petrodollars produced by the fossil fuel companies that Russia has invited into the COP27 are used to pay its war crimes, as reported by Desmog. Our research has already shown that these crucial discussions are heavily influenced by the interests of major polluters. The UN’s climate negotiations are made even more absurd by include the military cash machines for Putin’s regime that are fueled by Russian oil and gas.

Due to its twice the average global warming rate, Russia is especially sensitive to the climate issue. Nevertheless, it is the fourth-highest emitting nation in the world.

The invasion of Ukraine by Russia has the potential to undermine efforts being made throughout the world to address the climate catastrophe as Europe scrambles to make up for short-term reductions in gas imports from that nation.

According to Reuters, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy remarked in a video message shown at the COP27 that “successful climate policy cannot exist without peace.” Numerous nations have been compelled to restart coal-fired power generation as a result of the energy crisis brought on by the Russian war in order to reduce their citizens’ drastically growing energy expenses.

The Ukrainian delegation has also drawn attention to the direct effects the invasion has done to the environment.

According to Svitlana Grynchuk, Ukraine’s assistant environment minister, this is more than just a battle; it is state terrorism and ecocide, as The Guardian noted. Wildlife has been slaughtered, pollution has been produced, and social unrest has resulted from the invasion. Our power plants are still receiving missiles from the terrorist state. Due to this terrorist strike, our ecosystem is in danger.

Read More: Registrations of EVs Go up By 57%.!

On the other hand, the energy crisis can serve as a practical reminder of the value of switching from unstable fossil fuels to more dependable renewable sources. As a means of undermining Russia’s clout, which it has gained from the export of fossil fuels, Ukraine is likewise supporting the switch to renewable energy.

According to The Guardian, U.S. Climate Envoy John Kerry stated that EU and American officials were positive that the war speeds up the transformation.

Registrations of EVs Go up By 57%.!

Consumers registered more than 530,000 new battery-electric vehicles from January through September 2022, according to new data from information services company Experian Automotive, which shows that registrations for electric vehicles in the U.S. have increased 57% in the first nine months of 2022 over the same time period last year.

According to Experian Automotive’s newly released Automotive Consumer Trends Report 2022, EV registrations have surged by a staggering 250% over the last five years. Currently, there are more than 1.7 million electric vehicles registered, up from just over 400,000 in 2018. Only 5% of new vehicle registrations are EVs overall, although that percentage is rising.

 

Read More: This Solar-Powered SUV for $25,000 Is Coming to The U.S.!

The research reveals that as more options enter the market, people are increasingly choosing to purchase electric SUVs rather than sedans, and the increase is partially attributed to the growing diversity and accessibility of EV models from automakers. As of the second quarter of 2022, electric SUV registrations account for 59% of new EV registrations, while electric sedan registrations have decreased to roughly 35.77% of new EV registrations.

With many Californians switching to EVs at an early stage, the state continues to hold the highest registration share for EVs at about 40%. However, the research reveals that in Arizona, particularly in Phoenix and Tucson, EV registrations grew quickly in the first half of the year. Houston, Texas, and Chicago, Illinois also saw significant increases in the number of new EV registrations.

Read More: Biden Announces at COP27 a Tougher Crackdown on Methane Leaks.

Utility Dive stated that registrations for electric vehicle brands other than Tesla had significantly increased, with a 71% year-over-year growth in new EV registrations, or a total of 183,750 registrations, for both established manufacturers and start-up businesses.

With about 350,000 new EV registrations from January to September 2022, Tesla continues to lead for the time being. For the first three quarters of this year, the company’s Tesla Model Y was the vehicle with the newest EV registrations, closely followed by the Tesla Model 3.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E came in third place in terms of EV registrations, with Tesla’s Model S coming in fourth. Fifth-placed Volkswagen ID.4 completed the list.

It’s anticipated that the number of EV registrations will rise, even more, thanks in part to improved government tax incentives, falling EV prices, and expanding EV charging infrastructure around the country.

‘Solar and Wind Offer the Best Route for Economic Development’ in Africa, Report Finds

A new study published on Monday explains why countries throughout Africa would be wise to focus on making sizable investments in renewable solar energy and steer clear of the traps of the so-called “Dash for Gas” paradigm, which would burden economies with stranded assets, waste billions on pricey fossil fuel infrastructure, and heighten financial instability in the years to come.

According to a recent Carbon Tracker report titled “African Sun: Why Solar Not Gas Offers Continent the Best Economic Opportunity in the Transition,” the continent’s economic future will be based on electricity, with solar energy taking the lead. This is because renewable energy sources will replace dirty fossil fuels.

Read More: A ghost village emerges from the cracked earth as drought empties Spanish reservoir

Progressive economists and climate campaigners have urged nations not to follow the example of other petrostates or nations in the Global North that mined and burned their way through the fossil fuel era, even though some government leaders in Africa have backed the push by oil and gas giants to accelerate exploration and development of coal, oil, and gas resources.

The need for African crude oil and natural gas “will shrink as the globe delves deeper” into the switch to renewable energy, the report says as wealthier nations, particularly in Europe, continue to move away from burning oil and gas. Lower oil and gas prices as a result of decreased demand will make it more difficult for expensive infrastructure projects like pipelines to generate the promised returns on investment. This is happening at a time when the cost of renewables is continuing to decline and the promise of wind and solar is being realized globally.

Kofi Mbuk, the report’s primary author, declared in a statement that “the energy transition from fossil fuels to renewables is certain and irreversible.” “Renewable energy sources are currently squeezing out the need for fossil fuels to meet the expansion in energy demand on a regional and global scale. The best path for economic development is provided by solar and wind in Africa and other rising economies.

The push for renewable energy in Africa has been promoted by numerous supporters who contend that there is no reason for the Global South to pursue a filthy energy path while climate leaders from all over the world are still assembled at COP27 in Egypt.

While burning coal and gas now accounts for close to 60% of Africa’s electricity generation capacity, the new analysis notes that the continent’s physical position offers favorable circumstances for solar energy. Large-scale solar deployment in Africa has been “hampered by lack of money, poor electrical infrastructure, political and social instability, and almost 50% more sunlight than in the Global North,” according to the paper.

The report, according to a statement from Carbon Tracker,

requests that African authorities foster private investment by establishing a stable regulatory environment with favorable solar revenue models. Additionally, they must implement regulations to create a reliable and effective grid infrastructure that facilitates the installation of renewable energy sources and addresses issues with instability.

According to the study, solar energy could account for up to half of all installed capacity in Africa by 2050, growing from 14 GW in 2021 to 55 GW in 2030 and over 400 GW by that time.

Read More: Dramatic weather changes’: 150 million may be affected by ‘bomb cyclone’ across eastern US

According to Mbuk, it makes little economic sense for Africa to place itself on a course toward higher fossil fuel use when the cost of renewable energy is declining.

According to him, “African countries have the opportunity to unlock significant private and public money for their energy transition as the cost of solar continues to plummet rapidly.” By the end of this decade, establishing new solar energy facilities in Africa will be more cost-effective than maintaining existing coal and gas power plants for generating electricity..

Grid Credits for Californians Using Solar Power at Home Might Decrease by 75% Under a New Proposal.

According to statistics cited by The New York Times, California has more rooftop solar than any other state in the United States and produces as much electricity from this renewable energy source as 12 nuclear power reactors.

But there is a problem with the way rooftop solar is now controlled. Currently, homeowners that install solar panels can get a sizable credit for the electricity they sell back to the grid. This encourages the use of solar energy, which is crucial for achieving the state’s ambitious climate goals. However, there is a catch: the credit ends up being unjust to low-income Californians who are stuck paying for a disproportionately higher share of the cost of powering the state because they cannot afford to install solar panels.

The main issue is that households using rooftop solar don’t pay their fair share of utility fixed costs, such as those associated with transmission and distribution, wildfire mitigation and compensation, energy efficiency initiatives, low-income subsidies, and early technology investments, to name a few. Robert Archer, a former senior energy advisor for the U.S. Agency for International Development, addressed why homes without rooftop solar pay higher rates to cover fixed expenses in a recent OpEd to the Marin Independent Journal. The true solar tax is this.

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) on Thursday proposed new regulations for the Net Energy Metering (NEM) solar tariff in order to address these concerns.

The proposed idea would, in Cal Matters’ opinion:

  1. Reduce the credit that solar-panel users receive for selling electricity back to the grid by as much as 75 percent, though this would not apply to people already taking advantage of the credit.
  2. Encourage customers to install solar panels with a battery system.
  3. Adjust rates so that customers use power at times of day which increase the reliability of the grid.
  4. Provide $900 million in solar incentive payments, with $630 million going towards low-income Californians.

According to the CPUC, the new proposal would save the typical California utility customer of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison, or San Diego Gas & Electric $100 per month on electricity costs if they installed solar in the future and at least $136 per month if they installed solar panels and a battery. People could pay for the installation costs in nine years or less with these savings.

According to a press statement from the CPUC, the upgrade propels the solar business into the future so that it can assist the modern grid by encouraging the adoption of electric automobiles, heat pump water heaters, and other electrification products while also lowering rates for Californians.

According to Cal Matters, the new proposal is a tweak of an earlier one that would have taxed households with new solar installations $8 per kilowatt per month. This would have made it more difficult for California to achieve its target of obtaining 90% of its electricity from carbon-free sources by 2035 and 100% by 2045, according to the solar industry and other proponents of clean energy.

The solar industry welcomed the removal of the tax but objected to the reduction in credits.

According to Bernadette Del Chiaro, executive director of the California Solar and Storage Association, if implemented as written, the C.P.U.C.’s proposal would delay the objective of 100 percent sustainable energy while protecting utility monopolies and boosting their profits.

On the opposing side of the debate, the pro-equity coalition of 120 organizations, including low-income Californians, environmentalists, and labor, was equally unsatisfied.

Read More: Biden Announces at COP27 a Tougher Crackdown on Methane Leaks.

It is very disheartening that under this proposal, low-income households and all customers without solar would continue to pay a hidden tax on their electricity bills to support rooftop solar for primarily richer Californians. Kathy Fairbanks, a spokesman for Affordable Clean Energy for All, said in a press release. Given the massive new federal clean energy subsidies that will guarantee sustained development and hefty profits for major solar businesses for the ensuing ten years, the inability to finally eliminate the rising cost burden borne by non-solar customers in California is especially troubling.

According to The New York Times, the Inflation Reduction Act and the bipartisan infrastructure package offer tax credits for people who install residential solar or buy electric cars, as well as incentives for large utilities to create clean energy projects.

Read More: This Solar-Powered SUV for $25,000 Is Coming to The U.S.!

Cost-effective Clean Energy According to all published statistics, the wealthiest 40% of Californians make up about 70% of home solar users. Additionally, Californians without home solar spend an additional $245 per customer and $3.4 billion in additional electricity costs annually as a whole. By 2030, at current rates, that amount would increase to $10.7 billion annually for the entire country and more than $550 for each person.

According to Cal Matters, the CPUC will vote on the new proposal in December, and if accepted, it will go into effect in April. At a meeting on Wednesday, November 16, members of the public may voice their opinions.

 

What the Results of The Midterms Mean for The U.S. Climate Action.!

The fate of the 2022 U.S. midterm elections in regards to who would control the House and the Senate is still up in the air. However, the election made many good points about how important climate action is to American citizens.

Democrats won the governorship and both houses in four crucial states that may be poised to pass climate and renewable energy legislation, a historic environmental bond was passed in New York, Senators and House members won races by running on their support for the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), and a candidate for governor of New York won the election.

According to Gene Karpinski, president of the League of Conservation Voters, there was a significant green wave that affected all 50 states, according to a news conference covered by Inside Climate News.

Overall, whether or not the government will expand on the IRA’s historic commitment in climate change and renewable energy depends on which party holds majorities in the House and Senate. Republicans often oppose President Joe Biden’s quest for climate action, and there were worries that a change in party control would weaken the United States’ leadership on the issue ahead of the COP27 UN climate conference in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt.

There will likely be less climate legislation passed and more legal challenges to the Biden administration’s efforts if the results are bad for the Democrats. Before the election, Alice Hill, a climate expert with the Council on Foreign Relations, told The Guardian. The extent to which the United States can implement its climate policy will be in doubt.

According to CNN, the composition of both Houses of Congress is yet unknown. However, the absence of the anticipated red wave gives hope for continued federal action. In a post-election press conference, Biden noted that the Democrats had their best midterm for governors since 1986 and that they had lost fewer seats in the House than in any midterm election during a Democratic president’s first term in the previous four decades.

The vast majority of Americans support the initiatives in my economic agenda, including repairing America’s roads and bridges, bringing down the price of prescription drugs, making a historic investment in addressing the climate crisis, and ensuring that big businesses start paying their fair share of taxes, the president claimed.

The consequences of climate action have been uneven, but overall they are better than expected, according to David Shepheard of consulting firm Baringa Partners, who spoke to New Scientist.

There were a number of climate-related initiatives on the ballot. The biggest victory was the approval of a $4.2 billion environmental bond act in New York, and the biggest defeat was California’s decision to reject a tax on the wealthy in order to finance incentives for electric vehicle use. According to New Scientist, other noteworthy measures included a Florida bill to make it less expensive to flood-proof homes, which failed, and a Rhode Island legislation to boost flood resilience, which passed. According to Ballotpedia, Washington State voters also expressed their disapproval of a new tax on aviation fuel, although this was merely an advisory vote.

Read More: In the First Two-Thirds of 2022, Renewables Provided About 25% of Us Electrical Generation.

House and Senate: Voters favoured candidates who ran on climate change in a number of significant House and Senate races, according to advocacy group Climate Power

Michael Bennet, a senator from Colorado, was re-elected after advocating for renewable energy and environmental protection, while John Fetterman, a Democrat from Pennsylvania, won the Senate seat after denouncing the oil and gas industry for price gouging during the energy crisis and arguing that these companies should be held accountable.

Read More: How Solar Farms in Space Could Send Power to Earth.!

Abigail Spanberger (VA-7), Sharice Davids (KS-3) and Chris Pappas (NH-1) are three Democratic House candidates who prevailed in close elections by highlighting their support for the IRA.

State-level: In Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, and Minnesota, Democrats now control the governor’s office and both legislatures, giving them more power to pass environmental legislation that had previously been thwarted by Republicans.

According to Vox, Minnesota could adopt a bill mandating that 20 percent of cars be electric by 2030, while Michigan could succeed in closing the deteriorating line 5pipeline. According to Inside Climate News, the election of Democratic governors in Massachusetts and Maryland will make it simpler to adopt climate legislation.

Democrats have typically been able to make significant progress on climate change when they are in power, as was the case after the 2018 election in Colorado, Illinois, Maine, New Mexico, Nevada, and New York.

According to Howard Learner, president and executive director of the Environmental Law & Policy Center, as quoted by Inside Climate News, “I think there’s a really big opportunity.”

Biden Announces at COP27 a Tougher Crackdown on Methane Leaks.

President Biden will address COP27 on Friday and outline new initiatives to combat methane emissions from the oil and gas sector.

The new rule covers wells releasing less than 3 tonnes of methane annually and compels drillers to handle third-party leak reports. It supplements leak detection and monitoring rules introduced at COP26. The US Environmental Protection Agency undercounts methane emissions from oil and gas operations, according to numerous studies.

Read More: IRENA Report: The World Is Falling Short of Its Energy Transition Goals.!

Methane is the primary component of so-called “natural gas,” and over the course of 20 years, it traps 80 times more heat in the atmosphere than CO2. The oil and gas sector is the major industrial producer of methane pollution in the United States.

Read More: Manchin and Biden Argue Over Coal.!

A disproportionate share of the methane pollution from the oil and gas industry is released by low-producing “marginal wells.” Any road to limiting global temperature increases to 1.5 C over pre-industrial averages must include quickly reducing methane pollution from fossil fuel activities.

 

COP27 Is Attended by More than 600 Lobbyists for Fossil Fuels.!

This figure has climbed by more than 25% at the climate negotiations taking place this year in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt. At least 636 fossil industry lobbyists were registered at COP27, more than the combined delegations of the 10 nations most affected by the climate crisis, according to a study from Corporate Accountability, Corporate Europe Observatory, and Global Witness.

The findings reinforced efforts to prevent representatives of fossil fuels from participating in climate negotiations.

“Don’t encourage the mosquitoes if you want to combat malaria,” said Philip Jakpor of Public Participation Africa to BBC News. We won’t advance and we haven’t advanced as long as the fossil fuel lobby and its apparatus are in operation.

The study determined which of the more than 30,000 COP27 delegates were either affiliated with a corporation that conducted a significant amount of business in fossil fuels or was in attendance on behalf of a trade organization representing fossil fuel interests.

These included significant oil and gas producers including BP, Shell, and Chevron. The analysis is probably an underestimation because it used publicly accessible data and delegates who self-disclosed their affiliations to the industry. Additionally, it excludes representatives from other climate-harming sectors like plastics and farming.

The investigation revealed more representation for fossil fuels than any other country’s delegation, with the exception of the UAE, which has 1,070 members. But 70 of those members are also lobbyists for fossil fuels. 29 nations, including the UEA, included lobbyists for fossil fuels in their delegation.

The next-highest amount, 33, was in Russia. Three executives from Enbridge, an energy corporation constructing the contentious Line 3 pipeline that is being challenged by Indigenous communities, were part of Canada’s delegation.

The lobby for fossil fuels was significantly bigger than the one for frontline communities. The delegation of the 10 most affected nations was outnumbered, as was the delegation of any African nation and the entire Indigenous representation, according to Kick Big Polluters Out.

According to Kwami Kpondzo from Friends of the Earth Togo, who was quoted in The Guardian, “The explosion in the number of industry delegates attending the negotiations reinforces the conviction of the climate justice community that the industry views the COP as a carnival of sorts, and not a space to address the ongoing and imminent climate crisis.”

Read More: IRENA Report: The World Is Falling Short of Its Energy Transition Goals.!

The campaign to “Kick Big Polluters Out” has received support from more than 450 organisations, according to Global Witness, who argue that fossil fuel interests should be barred at climate meetings in the same manner that cigarette lobbyists are prohibited from influencing public health policy. Anyone who signs a petition on behalf of the group can support its four key demands:

  1. Ban polluters from participating in climate negotiations.
  2. Don t allow polluters to greenwashing-guide-2655331542.html”>greenwash their images by sponsoring climate talks or initiatives, as Coca-Cola is doing by sponsoring COP27.
  3. Facilitate the full participation of civil society, which has been restricted at COP27, especially by Egypt s anti-protest laws.
  4. Create a new system that favors a just transition over capitalist growth.

According to The Guardian, the case for including corporate representatives in climate negotiations like the COPs is that private businesses may be crucial in the switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy.

According to The Guardian, the United States Council for International Business stated that barring commercial interests from COPs will hinder and postpone implementation as well as marginalise one of the most important groups in the UNFCCC process.

Activists worry that the numerous fossil fuel industry lobbyists will actually prevent effective climate action.

Read More: The Crown Season 5 Skipped 1995’s Craziest Royal Moment. – Only Katy

At health conferences, tobacco lobbyists wouldn’t be permitted, and at peace conventions, arms dealers couldn’t advertise their business. The doors of a climate conference should not be opened to those who are sustaining the world’s addiction to fossil fuels.

A spokeswoman for the organizations behind the report released a statement saying that it is time for countries to stop lining the pockets of polluters, come to their senses, and assist in making COP27 the success that the world so desperately needs.

Exit mobile version